"taunt and broken"-->I'm assuming "taut and broken" but I'm not sure, I just know taunt doesn't work.
I'm not gonna be nitpicky about this one, but if you're saying Rogers's, it should be Rogers'
The bit about "Anger her, yes, but not surprise her." kind of seems cut, or at least not too connected to the previous statement. Maybe you could add something like "It might not take a lot to anger her" if you meant it like that.
Sorry sorry, I'm not sure about the rest; haven't got the time to check it all over. Those were the ones that jumped out at me though C:
Hope I don't sound too critical, that's just my inner grammar/spelling nazi.
no subject
I'm not gonna be nitpicky about this one, but if you're saying Rogers's, it should be Rogers'
The bit about "Anger her, yes, but not surprise her." kind of seems cut, or at least not too connected to the previous statement. Maybe you could add something like "It might not take a lot to anger her" if you meant it like that.
Sorry sorry, I'm not sure about the rest; haven't got the time to check it all over. Those were the ones that jumped out at me though C:
Hope I don't sound too critical, that's just my inner grammar/spelling nazi.